
2nd edition, full rebuild · EN+ZH PDFs · 14 figures, 17 tables · three horizons · Accumulate, $201 fully derived
USDT-TRC20 · Alipay (CNY equivalent) · File download delivery
Prepared by the TopX team from public information and reviewed and revised by professional investment managers and fund managers before release. Reviewers take part in a personal capacity, do not represent their respective employers and provide no investment advisory services through this site. Research content, not investment advice.
Method: every call registered in the period is shown — nothing is selected out. Hit rate = hits ÷ (hits + misses); open calls are excluded from the denominator. Outcomes are judged against the falsification conditions stated in each report. Past performance does not indicate future results. Not investment advice.
Palantir Technologies (NASDAQ: PLTR) company deep dive, second edition — full rebuild. Two PDFs, Chinese (29 pp) and English (31 pp), each with 18 chapters plus 4 appendices, 14 charts and 17 data tables, figure-for-figure identical; every derived number walked step by step in Appendix D. Reference date: close of 27 August 2026 ($185.93).
| # | Judgement | Key numbers |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | The growth engine is shifting from volume to price, and consumes almost no capital | net dollar retention 157% (four straight rises); FY2025 split: volume +34%, price +16.5%; each new dollar of operating capital returns ~$5/yr after tax |
| 2 | A 1.3% effective tax rate is dressing up earnings and the P/E | normalised at 21%: net income −20%, P/E 148x → 184x; the $3.45bn valuation allowance carries a two-sided break when released |
| 3 | Customer-count disclosure vanished the quarter after growth downshifted | growth printed 45% → 34%, then halted from Q1 2026; a three-step timeline verified across 15 releases |
| 4 | Insiders sold a net $896m in 12 months with zero buys — and the buyback was terminated in January 2026 | Class F pins <5% economics at 49.999999% of votes; two price signals from different filings, one direction |
| 5 | The funding side already rehearsed a fundamentals-free −41% deleveraging this year | Jan–Jun 2026 −41.0% while guidance was raised; β 1.91, IV30 47%, ~$63bn option notional |
| Metric | Reading | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth | +92.8%, twelve straight accelerating quarters | weighted peers +30.0% ex-MSFT — a ~63pp spread |
| Rule of 40 | 155 | nothing else in the set above 70 |
| Three order bases | RPO $4.9bn / TCV $3.37bn / RDV $6.24bn (+124%) | not interchangeable; RPO systematically understates the government book — taken apart in the report |
| Reverse-DCF implied growth | 32.9% for ten years, terminal 75% of EV | the price pays for persistence without precedent |
| Net cash | $9.4bn, zero debt | capex 0.7% of revenue; $1.76bn of cloud commitments are the invisible capex |
| Horizon | View |
|---|---|
| Monthly | Earnings vacuum: options price ±13.5% for 30 days ($161–$211) |
| Quarterly | Three Q3 checkpoints: NDR ≥150, a third guidance raise (eight straight beats make in-line a negative catalyst), triple-digit US-commercial TCV/RDV |
| Annual | Accumulate, target $201 (+8.2%): bear $112 (25%) / base $196 (50%) / bull $302 (25%) on an EV/S engine that bypasses the tax distortion; the base case matches sell-side consensus $12.1bn; migration triggers set in advance |
Rebuilt end to end on the seven-stage line: a nine-tile dashboard with multi-period series, a price ladder with the market's implied position and the option ±1σ band, monthly/quarterly/annual horizons, a scenario-to-action operating framework. The rating moves from Neutral to Accumulate and the target from $167 to $201 — not price-driven (ten sessions apart), but engine- and evidence-driven: the scenario engine switched from P/S-per-share to EV/S-enterprise value (bypassing the 1.3%-rate distortion), while NDR at 157% and a second guidance raise confirmed the price lever. The difference is itemised in Chapter 18, and the previous edition's calls remain on the public scorecard — nothing deleted, nothing hidden.
Primary sources: SEC EDGAR (CIK 0001321655) — 10-K, 10-Q, fifteen quarterly releases, DEF 14A and 59 Form 4 filings parsed trade by trade — XBRL companyfacts (full series from 2020), FINRA short interest, CBOE option chains; peers from Snowflake, Datadog, CrowdStrike, Microsoft, C3.ai and BigBear.ai filings. Every claim carries an [A]/[B]/[C]/[D] grade; twelve known limits are listed; every computed figure (normalised P/E, incremental returns, weighted peer growth, reverse DCF, the scenario engine) is reproduced in Appendix D.
Compiled independently by the TopX research team from public information, then reviewed and revised before release by professional investment managers and fund managers with asset-management experience. Reviewers take part in a personal capacity, do not represent their respective employers, and provide no investment advisory services through TopXEA; TopXEA holds no investment-adviser licence in any jurisdiction. Primary filings (SEC, exchanges, company disclosures) are the first-priority source, key figures require corroboration from at least two independent sources, claims carry [A]/[B]/[C]/[D] evidence grades, and known limitations are disclosed item by item inside the report. This is research content — not investment advice — and is not tailored to any investor; historical data and forward projections do not guarantee future results. Digital goods are non-refundable once delivered.
We pulled and read both of Palantir's 20 August Forms 144. A Form 144 is a notice of intent, not a sale; one filing names its 10b5-1 adoption date and the other leaves the field blank — and that field is where all the information sits. Plus a share-count trap that understates price-to-sales by 4.3%.
Same EA, same .set, two different equity curves. We isolated the chart timeframe in a controlled test: 60× the bar count, and every figure in both reports came back identical. The variables that actually move the number are elsewhere — ranked by impact, with our own measured data.
Make blue dots rare and people start calling purple ones blue. An oystercatcher will abandon its own egg for a more egg-like fake. AI need not replace you; it only has to nudge "normal" upward a few dozen times a day. We name that half CCAA and give an experiment that could start tomorrow.
Six-fold disagreement on one question — definitional, not a research-quality problem. The alternative: build it bottom-up from three quarterly-filed AI revenue lines.